Tweeter button Facebook button Youtube button

Posts Tagged ‘truth’

“CALL TO ACTION”

Saturday, High Noon – January 19th, 2013

Colorado State Capital
200 East Colfax Avenue  Denver, CO 80203  / 303.866.2604

GUN CONTROL ISN’T ABOUT GUNS…IT’S ABOUT CONTROL!

“Those who hammer their guns into plowshares will plow for those who do not.”  Thomas Jefferson

200 East Colfax Avenue  Denver, CO 80203  / 303.866.2604

Principles of Tyranny by Jon Roland

Now by “logical” what is meant is two-valued logic, which is sometimes also called Boolean, Aristotelian or Euclidean logic. In other words, a system of propositions within which a statement and its negation cannot both be true or valid. One of the two must be false or invalid. The two possible values are true and false, and every meaningful proposition can be assigned one or the other value.

For those Obama progressive 5th Column supporters  having trouble understanding English, some short research “shall” be needed below. We do not care what any public opinion polls say, the “public” doesn’t grant or deny our rights! The current transformation to a pure Democracy hasn’t been completed…yet!

Amendment II,

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

What is SHALL?

As used in statutes and similar instruments, this word is generally imperative or mandatory; but it may be construed as merely permissive or directory, (as equivalent to “may,”) to carry out the legislative intention and In cases where no right or benefit to any one depends on its being taken in the imperative sense, and where no public or private right is impaired by its interpretation in the other sense. Also, as against the government, “shall” is to be construed as “may,” unless a contrary intention is manifest. See Wheeler v. Chicago, 24 111. 105, 76 Am. Dec. 736; People v. Chicago Sanitary Dist., 184 111. 597, 56 N. E. 9.”.:;: Madison v. Daley (C. C.) 58 Fed. 753; Cairo & F. R. Co. v. Ilecht, 95 U. S. 170, 24 L. Ed. 423. SHAM PLEA. See PLEA. SHARE 1082 SHERIFF

“Shall” followed by “Not” is legislative intention for “Mandatory” and cannot be considered as equivalent or “may”, we are dealing with an inalienable Right acknowledged in the Bill of Rights!

Concerning The Militia, Federalist No. 29

State of Colorado

Real Coloradan’s have been asleep to the insurgent corruption of our 5th column Legislators and Courts for a  long time now, this is the result of  DeFacto interpretations of the Bill of Right’s Second Amendment, notice the dates of change regarding State’s Police Power and the blatant UN-Constitutionality of the legalize:  Colorado Constitution, Article II, Section 13

Article VI, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution, known as the Supremacy Clause, establishes the U.S. Constitution, Federal Statutes, and U.S. Treaties as “the supreme law of the land.” The text decrees these to be the highest form of law in the U.S. legal system, and mandates that all state judges must follow federal law when a conflict arises between federal law and either the state constitution or state law of any state. (Note that the word “shall” is used, which makes it a necessity, a compulsion.)

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.

Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

The only question left is… “What are you willing to do in order to preserve your Inalienable Rights and Fight Tyranny”?

July 2012 Freedom Index

It is all about the party, not the nation, not sovereignty, not freedom for and of the people, just about the party and a corrupt two party system.  A system supported by the ignorance of a none informed citizenry.
So here is a question for the RNC house of RINO’s. Why haven’t one of these people been approached and chosen to run for the office
of president?
Three Senators — Mike Crapo and Jim Risch of Idaho, and John Cornyn of Texas — earned 100 percent,
“but no one in the House did.”
So what do you suppose happened to those “conservative” hero’s in the house that everybody has been throwing praise upon?  You know, those who signed on to the NDA Act, those who signed on the the Free Speech Zones, just to name a couple of bills that couldn’t pass muster of the Bill of Rights, especially the Patriot Act.  They are all a bunch of political whores, it’s all about the perks and the money, and of course, Power.
Keep on drinking the Kool Aid people, you deserve every ounce of it.

Those great Americans from what was once the sovereign state of Colorado.

  1. DeGette (D ) 30% – - – + – - + – - + 17%  “Not surprised, being a socialist democrat”.
  2. Polis (D ) 30% – + – - – - + – - + 17%  “Again, not being surprised, a socialist democrat”.
  3. Tipton (R ) 80% + + + – + + – + + + 83%  “A RINO trying to wear a conservatives clothing. Trying, but not hard enough. Why not try for 100%”?
  4. Gardner (R ) 70% + + + – + + – + + – 76%  “Another RINO”.
  5. Lamborn (R ) 70% + + + – + + – + + – 77%   “And another RINO”.
  6. Coffman (R ) 70% + + + – + + – + + – 73%   “And another Rino(?) of whom Colorado should be extremely dismayed with.  I would expect a 100%”!
  7. Perlmutter (D ) 20% – - – - – - + – - + 23%   “And Again, not being surprised, a socialist democrat”.

Anglo



Freedom Index: A Congressional Scorecard Based on the U.S. Constitution.

This voting index is currently published twice a year in The New American magazine. Each index scores all 535 members of Congress on 10 key votes on a scale of 0% to 100%. The more the Representatives and Senators adhere to the Constitution in their votes, the higher their scores on this index. “DOWNLOAD a copy Here”

The Freedom Index: A Congressional Scorecard Based on the U.S. Constitution” rates Congressmen based on their adherence to constitutional principles of limited government,
fiscal responsibility, national sovereignty, and a traditional foreign policy of avoiding foreign entanglements.

To learn how any Representative or Senator voted on the key measures described herein, look him or her up in the vote charts. The scores are derived by dividing a Congressman’s constitutional votes (pluses) by the total number he cast (pluses and minuses) and multiplying by 100. The average House score for this index (votes 21-30) is 47
percent, and the average Senate score is 43 percent.

This is our third index for the 112th Congress. Our first index (votes 1-10) appeared in our August 8, 2011 issue, and our second index (votes 11-20) appeared in our January 9, 2012 issue.

We encourage readers to examine how their own Congressmen voted on each of the 10 key measures, as well as overall. We also encourage readers to commend legislators for their constitutional votes and to urge improvement where needed.

To contact your own Representative and Senators about key issues, go to JBS.org, click on “Act Now,” then click on “Fed. Legis.
Action Alerts.”

Login
Video Channel