Posts Tagged ‘duty’
The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves; whether they are to have any property they can call their own; whether their Houses, and Farms, are to be pillaged and destroyed, and they consigned to a State of Wretchedness from which no human efforts will probably deliver them. The fate of unborn Millions will now depend, under God, on the Courage and Conduct of this army—Our cruel and unrelenting Enemy leaves us no choice but a brave resistance, or the most abject submission; this is all we can expect—We have therefore to resolve to conquer or die: Our own Country’s Honor, all call upon us for a vigorous and manly exertion, and if we now shamefully fail, we shall become infamous to the whole world. Let us therefore rely upon the goodness of the Cause, and the aid of the supreme Being, in whose hands Victory is, to animate and encourage us to great and noble Actions—The Eyes of all our Countrymen are now upon us, and we shall have their blessings, and praises, if happily we are the instruments of saving them from the Tyranny meditated against them. Let us therefore animate and encourage each other, and shew the whole world, that a Freeman contending for Liberty on his own ground is superior to any slavish mercenary on earth… George Washington, July 2, 1776
Today, Patriots in Kansas and in other States should support the Kansas Attorney General, it’s Governor and some within her Legislature. They have initiated the process of reclaiming inalienable Sovereignty for the Kansas people from a Tyrannical, Progressive Federal Government including the Insurgent, Obama Administration by using one of the most overlooked tools in the American arsenal… the exegetical interpretation of “The U.S. Constitution”.
Although, we must continue to be guarded in our praise of any man, as they often turn to the opposite of their stated moral and ethical standards only to be replaced by a willingness of corruption, thereby leaving only political ambition and the desire of absolute tyrannical power… and, also considering… Kansas enjoys a record of electing Progressives like Kathlene Sebelius, Former Governor from 2003 to 2009 and the current abortion pusher in charge of Health and Human Services for Barry Obama, her record has not exactly been one, as a Constitutional stalwart has it?
Is Kansas on the verge of reclaiming it’s sovereignty with Senate Bill 102? It has sure gotten Eric Holders attention. SB 102, full text and history. The Legislative Summary as follows;
Second Amendment Protection Act; SB 102SB 102 establishes the Second Amendment Protection Act.First, the bill excludes from federal regulation any personal firearm, firearm accessory, or ammunition manufactured commercially or privately and owned in Kansas.The bill provides that for as long as any such personal firearm, firearm accessory, or ammunition remains within the borders of Kansas, it is not subject to any federal law, regulation, or authority.Second, the bill prevents any federal agent or contracted employee, any state employee, or any local authority from enforcing any federal regulation or law governing any personal firearm, firearm accessory, or ammunition manufactured commercially or privately and owned in Kansas, provided it remains within the borders of Kansas. In the process of a criminal prosecution, the bill precludes any arrest or detention prior to a trial for a violation of the Act.Finally, the bill allows a county or district attorney or the Attorney General to seek injunctive relief in court to enjoin certain federal officials from enforcing federal law regarding a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured commercially or privately and owned in the state of Kansas and that remains within the borders of Kansas.
As we know, Eric Holder, Chief Law Enforcement officer at the “Department of Just Us” sent a threatening letter to the current Kansas Governor reminding him of Mr. Holders inept interpretation of the Constitution and the 2nd Amendment. See the Letter from Eric Holder Here. As you can see his interpretation of the Founders intent is very skewed and Progressive, much like his interpretation of Hate Crimes, Election Fraud and Gun Running and the current Administration’s Support of terrorism… If you think that is a stretch, ask any Mexican citizen if they think the current ongoing slaughter of their country men, woman and children is not terror. There are very few stronger restrictions on Gun ownership than in Mexico, as the saying goes… “Outlaw Guns, and only Outlaws will have Guns”.
Eric Holders letter garnered a response from Kansas Secretary of State, Kris W. Kobach, explaining his true and correct Constitutional Rights, not to mention his Obligation of Oath to the Sovereign people in the State of Kansas. Educating Mr. Holder as to his responsibilities to “NOT” enforce unconstitutional laws. Read the Letter Here
The Constitution is not a living document designed to fit the whims of a Tyrannical power, no matter what branch of Government it has derived from, it is the very Foundation of our Laws (or was intended to be). We have lost, to a great extent of the original intent of our Republic through mindless Progressive education and apathy among the American people, it is heartening to see it being upheld at a State level as Kansas is doing… better keep an eye on this one it could be the next “Shot Heard Around the World”.
We will either Restore the Founders Constitutional vision of America or Die in the Attempt…
“Since private and public Vices, are in Reality, though not always apparently, so nearly connected, of how much Importance, how necessary is it, that the utmost Pains be taken by the Public, to have the Principles of Virtue early inculcated on the Minds even of children, and the moral Sense kept alive, and that the wise institutions of our Ancestors for these great Purposes be encouraged by the Government. For no people will tamely surrender their Liberties, nor can any be easily subdued, when knowledge is diffused and Virtue is preserved. On the Contrary, when People are universally ignorant, and debauched in their Manners, they will sink under their own weight without the Aid of foreign Invaders.” –Samuel Adams, letter to James Warren, 4 November 1775
The Communist Control Act was a piece of United States federal legislation, signed into law by President Dwight Eisenhower on 24 August 1954, which outlawed the Communist Party of the United States and criminalized membership in, or support for the Party.
Created during the period of the Second Red Scare (1946–1954), the Act was one of many bills drafted with the intention of protecting America from the potential threat posed by the international Communists. During this time, some argued that “the pursuit of subversive aims even by peaceful means should have been outlawed.” Thus, many opposed Communism because of its supposed “subversive aim” to undermine democracy. In the words of the prominent sociologist Ernest van den Haap, there was “no place in democracy for those who want to abolish it even with a peaceful vote.”
At one time the Progressives had something to worry about but as we can now see, just as those of “homosexual persuasion have exited their closet”, the American Liberal Democrats, are now un-afraid and are exiting their closet of Communism and they have grown in numbers. Indoctrination within our educational and media systems while Americans have been asleep at the wheel is lending aid and comfort unknowingly. We are now in the red zone and unless we turn the head waters of Communism now, we will be in a blood bath, on a path of no return to civility.
Take note: The overwhelming support provided by the liberals has attracted much attention from historians such as Mary McAuliffe (The Journal of American History). McAuliffe argues that, despite the liberals’ traditional role as the protectors of fundamental rights and civil liberties, the perceived gravity of the threat of Communism during the Cold War led some liberals to ignore the fact that the CCA suspended the citizenship rights of the Communist Party members. Most liberals did not even offer a token opposition to the Act; on the contrary, they ardently supported it. McAuliffe further acknowledges that the Act “served to avert possible disaster for individual politicians” who feared being labeled as Communists for their left-minded ideas. In the words of Senator Humphrey, “the amendment [was sought] to remove any doubt in the Senate as to where [Democrats and liberals] [stood] on the issue of Communism.” An article published in the Michigan Law Review in 1955 suggested that the Communist Control Act was a “dramatic political gesture” rather than a genuine attempt to “kill Communism at its root.
Interview of Frank Llewellyn, Democratic Socialist of Amerika
Democratic Socialist of America ( DSA): Website Here
Young Democratic Socialist of America (YDSUSA): Website Here
Communist Party of America (CPUSA): Website Here
Socialist International: Website Here
Q: What is the Socialist International?
A: It is the worldwide organization of socialist, social democratic and labor parties. It currently brings together 131 political parties and organizations from all continents. Its origins go back to the early international organizations of the labor movement of the last century.* It has existed in its present form since 1951, when it was re-established at the Frankfurt Congress. They are now headquartered in London, England.
* In 1864, representatives of English and French industrial workers founded the International Workingmen’s Association in London. Karl Marx, who was living in London at the time, became the First International’s dominant figure. Marx’s doctrines were revived in the 20th century by Russian revolutionary Vladimir Ilich Lenin, who developed and applied them – and we all know that what was started as a labor movement ended up as the biggest totalitarian/communist state, i.e., the USSR.
Q: What is the Democratic Socialists of America [DSA]?
A: It is the largest socialist organization in the United States, and the principal U.S. affiliate of the Socialist International. Their website is http://www.dsausa.org/dsa.html
Q: What are seven principles behind what the DSA calls it’s, “Progressive Challenge?”
- Dignified Work
- Environmental Justice
- Economic Redistribution
- Democratic Participation
- Community Empowerment
- Global Non-Violence
- Social Justice.
Never mind their soothing-sounding leftist doublespeak like ‘Environmental Justice’ (whatever that is supposed to mean) or the soft & fuzzy ‘Global Non-Violence’ (a euphemism for unilateral disarmament) — the DSA’s self-declared principle of ‘Economic Redistribution’ clearly shows where these folks are coming from and exactly where they plan to take America.
Q: How many members of the U.S. Congress are also members of the DSA?
Who are the Democratic Socialist Amerika members sitting on the House Judiciary Committee
John Conyers , Jerrold Nadler, Melvin Watt, Maxine Waters, Hank Johnson, Steve Cohen, Barbara Lee, Robert Wexler, Linda Sanchez [there are 23 Democrats on the Judiciary Committee of which eleven, almost half, are now members of the DSA].